A ship’s logbook is not just a mandatory safety requirement; it is essential for understanding any sequence of events on a voyage including the operational status and decision-making processes on board vessels at critical times. Electronic logbooks (eLogs) are not new to the industry. The IMO has facilitated a transition to eLogs by endorsing their use under MARPOL since October 2020. 

A survey carried out for ABS Wavesight into usage patterns and adoption of eLogs returned some results that appear contradictory. 

Illustrating the scale of the underlying change, 72% of maritime professionals surveyed report that their organisations have adopted electronic logs in some form. Among these, 28% have transitioned entirely, while 44% utilise a combination of paper logs and eLogs, signalling a major move towards digital solutions. 

Staci Satterwhite, CEO, ABS Wavesight

Despite the push towards digitalisation, a notable portion of the industry surveyed (28%) still relies exclusively on paper logs. At the same time, resistance to using eLogs is prompted by perceptions that they are more time-consuming. 

Managers leading the way 

ABS Wavesight surveyed 144 maritime professionals, including masters, engineers, fleet managers, and technical managers at commercial shipping and shipping management companies, on their current practices and their perspectives on eLogs.  

According to the survey, ship managers are leading the charge in the adoption of eLogs, with nearly half (48%) having completely transitioned, compared to only 23% of shipowners. These companies are likely to adopt eLogs at a higher rate for several reasons.  

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Their larger scale and more complex operations necessitate efficient log management, while stricter regulatory compliance and industry quality systems drive the need for more precise and easily accessible records

Central oversight is easier to achieve with digital tools that provide real-time data, and eLogs improves the ability to preemptively address risks through better data analysis. 

eLogs can improve operational efficiency through streamlined processes and reduced manual data entry and also enhance data protection and accuracy, reducing the risk of errors and data tampering. 

As third-party service providers, ship managers say increasing demands from clients and stakeholders for transparency and quick access to data are more readily met with electronic systems. 

Consequences of eLog non-compliance 

The consequences of inadequate log management are substantial and affect a majority of shipowners and ship managers alike, creating serious operational, financial, and even legal repercussions. 

60% of companies questioned reported ships being held up at ports due to issues with logbook maintenance, and 49% reported being fined.  

The risk of port delays is even greater for companies relying solely on paper logs, with 88% surveyed saying they faced delays at port. Ship management companies surveyed also report a higher incidence of port delays (66%) compared to shipowners (59%). 

Frequent fines are another common issue, with almost half (49%) of companies surveyed saying they’ve been fined due to log maintenance issues. Fines are more prevalent among shipping companies, where 57% have been penalised, compared to just 21% of ship management firms. 

Respondents also indicated that their companies have experienced claims issues (43%), audit failures (39%), and legal issues (15%), with a pronounced problem among those receiving logs ashore only monthly. More than half (55%) of companies surveyed that receive logs ashore monthly have experienced legal issues compared to only 15% overall. 

Logging the problems and continuing the transition

Paper-based logbooks continue to present significant challenges, with the greatest impacts on data reliability and operational efficiency. Incomplete or missing data (51%), inaccurate data (49%), and misplaced logbooks (48%) are the top three challenges reported with paper-based logbooks. 

Despite the clear advantages of eLogs, barriers continue to impede more widespread adoption within the maritime industry. As a result, decision-making, compliance, and operational integrity can all be impacted. In the case of lost or misplaced logbooks, maritime companies potentially face serious operational disruptions in addition to compliance and customer issues. 

As the digitalisation of the shipping industry continues, the adoption of eLogs is set to become standard practice.

The transition from paper logs to eLogs is driven by the need for more accurate, reliable, and timely record-keeping. eLogs can be a fundamental component that enhance operational efficiency and also play a critical role in enabling compliance with maritime regulations and quality systems. 

They offer substantial improvements over paper logs, including enhanced data integrity, easier access to real-time information, and more effective risk management. They allow for quicker decision-making processes and provide a competitive edge by improving the overall responsiveness of shipping operations.  

As the digitalisation of the shipping industry continues, the adoption of eLogs is set to become standard practice, mandated by both the demands of compliance and the necessities of modern shipping operations.  

Companies that proactively embrace this change can not only stay ahead in terms of compliance but can also enjoy enhanced operational efficiencies, improved safety standards, and a competitive advantage.