Shippers are used to changing winds and having to be flexible with plans, and that will likely be a useful skill going into four more years of President Trump in the US.
It’s only been a week since the US went to the polls and returned a shocking (to some) landslide for the former leader and erstwhile businessman, and his cabinet team is only just starting to take shape.
Go deeper with GlobalData
As the administration-elect builds between now and 20 January 2025 (the date of the Presidential inauguration in Washington DC), Ship Technology spoke to industry experts to take a temperature of the sector’s reaction.
One word on everyone’s lips
It’s well understood that without container ships, bulkers, and tankers the interconnected global economy simply wouldn’t work at the pace that has been achieved over the past 50 years.
And while free trade has benefitted many, it has also led to the protectionist backlash the world witnessed emanating from DC during Trump 1.0. Tariffs on imports were a central promise in the 2024 Trump campaign, and concern about their effect on the transport sector is hard to avoid in maritime circles.
Of all the transport sectors, shipping is most affected by rising tariffs. Judah Levine, chief analyst at freight trading platform Frieghtos described the impact on the industry.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalData“In 2018, Trump’s announcement of tariff increases led to a significant pull forward of ocean imports as shippers rushed to bring in goods before the tariff increases went into effect in early 2019,” he reminded Ship Technology.
With global rates as high as 20%, and 60-100% increases on Chinese goods threatened during the campaign, Levine is certain that tariff fears will again lead to significant front-loading at US ports – perhaps even before any official announcement is made.
“Anticipation that Trump will follow through on these campaign promises could be enough to spur some increase in ocean freight demand and rates starting now, with these trends possibly intensifying once tariff increases are actually announced,” Levine wrote.
A significant difference from the 2016 term will be the “already elevated floor” of the spot rate market due to additional political strains, most notably the Red Sea crisis that has pushed East-West trans-Suez rates to at least double their price in 2023. Although these rates have halved since the peak of the crisis, some journeys (especially to the US West Coast) are triple their previous price.
Data from Xeneta – another ocean and air freight intelligence platform – showed Trump’s ramping up tariffs on Chinese imports in 2018 caused ocean container shipping freight rates to spike more than 70%.
Xeneta’s chief analyst Peter Sand painted Ship Technology a similar picture.
“The knee-jerk reaction from US shippers will be to frontload imports before Trump is able to impose his new tariffs. Back in 2018, the tariff on Chinese imports was 25%, now it is increasing up to 100% so the incentive to frontload is even greater,” Sand explained.
“If you have warehouse space and the goods to ship, frontloading imports is the simplest way to manage this risk in the short term – but it will bring its own problems. A sudden increase in demand on major trade lanes into the US when ocean supply chains are already under pressure due to disruption in the Red Sea will place upward pressure on freight rates,” he added.
More of the same?
But some would argue that US ports and importers are used to this kind of fluctuation – after all, we saw serious frontloading earlier this year as stakeholders prepared for a mass strike of dock workers.
Margaret Kidd is a professor teaching on supply chain and logistics technology at the University of Houston, and explained the reason for rising rates as the shipping sector prepares for January.
“There is no question retailers and manufacturers alike have been frontloading imports ahead of anticipated tariffs. This is similar to what we witnessed May – August of this year in anticipation of the ILA strike. Frontloading tends to cause an acceleration of ocean rates based on increased demand for containers and vessels which also then impacts demand for trucking and warehousing,” she said.
“While tariffs increase the cost of global trade the devil will be in the details as how these tariffs will be implemented.”
But even if ports, shipping firm, and importers all know the change is coming there remains little they can do to stop its negative effects.
“We saw the negative impact of tariffs during Trump’s first term in office in 2018 when ocean container shipping rates spiked 70%. Shippers will be fearing more of the same this time around,” Sand told Ship Technology.
“In the longer term, another Trump presidency will reignite the trade war with China and provoke retaliatory action. In 2018, we saw China respond to US aggression by imposing tariffs of its own, which added even more fuel to the fire, so there is a risk this situation could escalate further in the months and years to come,” he continued.
But another similarity to 2016, or at least the political promises that were laid ahead of the administration taking office, is the focus on US infrastructure restoration.
Maritime lawyer José Cot told Ship Technology that ports are expected to be part of Trump’s wider infrastructure spending plans, potentially paid for by higher rates for foreign operators.
“Trump has pledged increased spending on American infrastructure, including port facilities. This is likely to be part of a broader agenda, including infrastructure funding and tax incentives for American companies, and additional fees and oversight regarding foreign shipping companies.”
Kidd, however, disagreed. In spite of the much-needed and much-lauded Biden-Harris IRA spending and Clean Ports Programme, she did not think ports would be high on Trump’s agenda.
“The US port sector under the Biden/Harris Administration has seen an influx of much needed infrastructure investment. Most recently through the Environmental Protection Agency $ 3 billion Clean Ports Program grants. The transformative nature of these investments from the Inflation Reduction Act were generational in nature.
I envision the incoming administration reigning in government spending and definitively not supporting infrastructure investments that combat the climate crisis,” the Texas academic said.
While they might disagree on the likelihood of ports directly benefitting from federal money, Cot shared a similar view to Kidd on the environmental focus (or lack thereof) from Trump and his team.
In Cot’s view, however, this could benefit parts of the maritime sector.
“Trump’s pledge to remove regulatory obstacles to oil and gas exploration and production will benefit the marine and energy sectors, including supply companies supporting offshore exploration and drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. This could drive additional investment and job creation in these sectors,” he opined.
While this could create growth in the offshore sector, it might be seen by some as akin to moving deck chairs on the Titanic. Wind and other offshore power systems have not overtaken oil and gas in the energy sector, but maritime investments have started to shift toward those energy streams.
